OWI
stands for Operating While Intoxicated, and is the term Iowa and some other
states use for driving while drunk or under the influence of drugs. You may be more familiar with DUI (Driving
Under the Influence) which is used in other states and is used more commonly in
popular culture.
Iowa’s
OWI law can be found in Section 321J of the Iowa Code. The section is quite lengthy and has multiple
subparts. For the purpose of defining
OWI, we will go to Section 321J.2(1), which is the section that specifically
criminalizes OWI. To quote the statute:
“A person
commits the offense of operating while intoxicated if the person operates a
motor vehicle in this state in any of the following conditions:
a. While under the influence of an
alcoholic beverage or other drug or a combination of such substances.
b. While having an alcohol concentration of
.08 or more.
c. While any amount of a controlled
substance is present in the person, as measured in the person’s blood or urine.”
As
laws go, this is pretty simply worded, but there are a couple things worth
mentioning. First, subsection (a) is a
sort of catch all provision that gives the state a great deal of leeway in
charging. Under this section, a
particular level of blood alcohol need not be proven. This means that, despite what many people
think, beating a breathalyzer is not the most important thing in these
cases. Second, note that any amount of a
controlled substance is sufficient for an arrest under this statute. Also note that the term is “controlled”
substance, not “illegal.” A person can
be convicted of OWI for having perfectly legal prescription drugs in their
system.
Our
next post will continue discussing OWI, but if you’ve been charged with OWI,
don’t wait. You may want to contact an Iowa Criminal Defense Attorney today,
like those found at Van Cleaf & McCormack Law Firm. You can call today to schedule a free
consultation.
No.
Okay, perhaps that needs a little more explanation. However, the answer is just that simple. I could try to explain why, but, someone else has done it perfectly:
James Duane is a professor at Regent University School. If you haven't seen this video, take the time to watch it. Professor Duane explains in detail why, no matter whether you've done anything wrong or not, you should never consent to being questioned by the police. If you haven't followed Professor Duane's advice, you may want to contact an Iowa Criminal Defense Attorney today, like those found at Van Cleaf & McCormack Law Firm. You can call today to schedule a free
consultation.
Welcome to the Van Cleaf &
McCormack Law Firm Criminal Defense Blog.
This blog’s purpose is to provide general information about criminal
defense in Iowa, including descriptions of various offenses, discussion of
relevant case law, and information that we feel would be useful to people in
the position of needing an Iowa Criminal Defense Attorney. As a brief disclaimer: This blog and any response to comments by Van
Cleaf & McCormack Law Firm or any of its employees are not intended as a
substitute for professional legal advice or services. Nothing here is intended to or does form an
attorney-client relationship between the reader and Van Cleaf & McCormack
Law Firm. We strongly urge you to
contact an attorney if you are facing criminal charges, be that an attorney
with our firm or another. We also urge
you to review the full disclaimer at the bottom of the page.
Let’s start with what is, for many,
the most pertinent question people have when looking at private criminal attorneys: Why not just take a court-appointed
attorney? We’ve all heard the Miranda
Warning on TV and in movies, with its famous line, “If you cannot afford an
attorney, one will be appointed for you.”
This is true. Iowa Code §815.9
provides that any person at or below 125% of the U.S. poverty level (in 2013,
for a single person, this is $14,362.50, or a little over 38 hours/week at
minimum wage) is entitled to be appointed an attorney by the court. People up to 200% of the U.S. poverty level
can have an attorney appointed if the judge decides that to not appoint one
would cause “substantial hardship” and people above 200% can only have an
attorney appointed if they are charged with a felony AND not appointing an attorney
would cause “substantial hardship.”
However, it is important to note
what isn’t said in any of these statutes or in the Miranda warning. They never say that the appointed attorney is
a free attorney, and that’s because Iowa Code §815.9(4) specifically provides
that a person is required to reimburse the state for court appointed attorney’s
fee. While the court is technically
required to rule on whether the person has the ability to pay said fees,
experience has shown us that most judges will always assess the full
amount. This is true even if the person
is acquitted or the charges are dismissed.
If you’re going to pay for a criminal
defense attorney either way, why wouldn’t you pay for an attorney of your
choice? Consider having a consult with
an Iowa Criminal Defense Attorney today, like those found at Van Cleaf &
McCormack Law Firm. You can call today
to schedule a free consultation.